EXTRAORDINARY claims aimed at gullible people are distressingly common. Less common are utterly incomprehensible claims aimed at⦠well, who knows?
Andrew Hemsley finds P.W.B. Special One Drop Liquid unusual in that it is almost impossible to work out what itās supposed to do. According to , it āpossesses a most extraordinary property. The human senses, in common with the requirements of all living material including trees and all other green plants, have evolved the requirements for forward facing light energy.ā
Advertisement
Whatās that, then? Not much help here: āLight, in common with most energies within Nature, readily forms an inverse pattern of itself when encountering an obstacle. Light is particularly modified when encountering a transparent obstacle⦠To demonstrate the inverse pattern formation on objects which fill the modern environment, simply place salt on one face and sugar on another face of the object.ā
There may be a clue in this instruction: āAll Compact Discs should have a drop of the Special One Drop Liquid applied to both sides and spread across the surface using a finger tipā ā but we are also advised to put it on photographs and electric light bulbs.
So what is it about? What would it do if it worked?
Feedback canāt even find a price for the stuff. But there are many more puzzling gems of content-free marketing at . These include a āQuantum Clip ā capable of manipulating certain inanimate material into a condition that mimics the quantum state of our living sensesā, at a mere Ā£500.
From ābecuaseā to ātehā
IS ābecuaseā, with its 4,950,000 hits on a famous web search engine, the commonest typo in the English language? Graham Barrow asked this question on 20 October and many readers took up the challenge. Here are just some of their findings.
āVivyan Lisewski has sent us a photo of a sign in New Zealand that states categorically: āWater and mud pools do not climb fencesāā
When Alex Llewelyn searched for āaccomodateā on the FWSE he got 6,610,000 hits; āsenceā scored 8,040,000 and ādefinatelyā logged an incredible 17,400,000. John Laveryās āseperateā also checked in at about 17,000,000, so these all beat ābecuaseā.
But what about misspellings of the really common words in the English language? Here the picture becomes more complicated. Using ātehā scores 27,100,000, but as several readers have pointed out, this has become a legitimate way of spelling the word among the web fraternity. It even has its own Wikipedia entry.
Rusty Nash and William Cowley note that with āofā and āandā things are more complicated still. A search for āfoā scores 78,000,000 and ānadā scores 153,000,000, but both these words are acronyms as well as misspellings, so we donāt know what the true figure for typos is.
There are other complications too. David Critchard points out that some of the commonest typos may be ones that produce a real word. These will not be identifiable as typos in the FWSE ā nor by any spellchecker. An example is āfromā for āformā. Critchard found the phrase āthe human fromā repeated consistently in an art history book he read recently.
Barry Rein notes another flaw in the typo scores: a common word that is only rarely mistyped might get more hits on the FWSE than a less common word that is often mistyped. So to find out which words are most frequently misspelled whenever they are used we would need to give the figure as a ratio of the number of hits of the mistyped word to the total number of hits of the word correctly spelled.
More research is required, it seems.
THE IChemE ā aka the UKās Institution of Chemical Engineers ā recently distributed a flyer for a hazard and operability (or HAZOP for short) analysis training course. Unfortunately, James Savery tells us, while the main title on page 1 did not contain any spelling mistakes, āthe message probably wasnāt quite what they had in mindā. It read: āBecome a competent an defective member of a HAZOP team.ā
TRYING to find out if ātransitionedā is a real word, Howard Haigh turned to a famous web search engine and was directed to . Here he discovered that he could download āa free English thesaurus and dictionaryā.
Intrigued, he decided to read the licensing conditions. These told him that he could use the program free of charge indefinitely only if he took āat most 4 flights (2 return flights) in any 12 month periodā and if he did not āown or regularly drive an SUV (sports utility vehicle)ā.
Haig assures us that happily he meets both these requirements, but they set him wondering if these are unusual licence conditions for free software. Weād like to hear if there are others like them.
āDO THEY know something I donāt?ā wondered Michael Richardson when he received an email from British Airways. It was headed āDr Richardson, last few days of our Worldā.
Then he opened it, and found the next words were āOffers Saleā.