麻豆传媒

A new estimate of how fast Saturn spins has been made using magnetic data from NASA鈥檚 Cassini spacecraft 鈥� but it is not the answer scientists were expecting.

As a gas giant, Saturn鈥檚 rotation has been historically difficult to measure. Its hazy atmospheric features shift with respect to each other and cannot be used to clock the spin rate of the planet鈥檚 interior.

The most commonly cited figure for Saturn鈥檚 rotation period 鈥� 10 hours, 39 minutes and 22.4 seconds 鈥� was derived in 1980 from Voyager observations of radio waves generated by solar radiation hitting the planet鈥檚 atmosphere. Yet Cassini has returned a result almost 8 minutes longer, a difference that defies easy explanation.

鈥淭he knowledge of the rotation period is a very important ingredient when you try to model the interior of a planet like Saturn,鈥� says Giacomo Giampieri of NASA鈥檚 Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Reconcilable differences?

Giampieri and colleagues examined data gathered over a 14-month period from Cassini鈥檚 fluxgate magnetometer. The data revealed a small periodic signal in Saturn鈥檚 magnetic field measuring 10 hours, 47 minutes.

If the signal is indeed tied to the rotation of the planet鈥檚 solid core, as the Cassini team proposes, it is not clear how this can be reconciled with the earlier Voyager measurement.

鈥淣obody in their right mind could think the rotation rate of Saturn has changed so much in that period,鈥� says Donald Gurnett, principal investigator for the Cassini Radio and Plasma Wave Science instrument at the University of Iowa, US. Such a dramatic change in a planet of Saturn鈥檚 size would require enormous energy. If such a force was being exerted, it would have long ago slowed the planet鈥檚 rotation rate down to a snail鈥檚 pace.

One possible explanation is that the electrically charged ionosphere surrounding Saturn is 鈥渟lipping鈥� relative to the planet鈥檚 rotation. This ionosphere influences the shape of the magnetic field, so a change in the friction between the ionosphere and upper atmosphere, due perhaps to seasonal variations in solar illumination, might account for the difference between the Voyager and Cassini data.

Wobble free

鈥淚t is absolutely not an instrumental error,鈥� says Gurnett, who was also principal investigator for the radio-sensing instrument on Voyager.

Previously scientists have used Jupiter鈥檚 magnetic field to determine its rotation rate without ambiguity. Like Saturn, Jupiter鈥檚 magnetic field is generated deep in the planet鈥檚 interior and loops far out into space. But because Jupiter鈥檚 field is tilted slightly, it wobbles as the planet rotates.

The wobble creates a strong periodic signal in Jupiter鈥檚 magnetic field which is a reliable indicator of the planet鈥檚 rotation speed. In contrast, Saturn鈥檚 magnetic field is aligned with its rotational axis so there is no wobble effect.

The periodicity measured by Cassini is more likely to be caused by some kind of magnetic anomaly within Saturn, possibly tied to the nature of the planet鈥檚 solid core.

Journal reference: Nature (vol 441, p 62)