X-RAYS and CT scans expose a minority of Americans to radiation levels comparable to working in a nuclear power plant. Are such scans worth it?
Reza Fazel of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and colleagues looked at health insurance records for over 650,000 people who had at least one imaging procedure in a three-year period. Most received low doses of radiation, but around 2 per cent got doses equal to or above the suggested yearly exposure for someone working in a nuclear power plant (The New England Journal of Medicine, vol 361, p 849). Fazel says further studies are needed to work out if such medical scans benefit or damage health overall.
鈥淪ome patients got doses above the suggested levels for someone working in a nuclear power plant鈥�
Advertisement
Commenting on the research, radiologist at Harvard Medical School points to a recent study reporting that medical imaging accounted for in the US between 1991 and 2004.
