Āé¶¹“«Ć½

Aimee Mullins: Two legs good, 24 legs better

The actress, model, athlete and double amputee tells how technology is changing the way society views people with physical impairments
Aimee Mullins, in a photo taken by visual artist Matthew Barney for his film Cremaster 3
Aimee Mullins, in a photo taken by visual artist Matthew Barney for his film Cremaster 3
(Image: Matthew Barney, courtesy of the Gladstone Gallery)

In Āé¶¹“«Ć½ we often write about the future technological enhancement of humans, but some enhancements are already with us. Jessica Griggs talks to actress, model, athlete and double amputee Aimee Mullins and discovers how technology is changing the way society views people with physical impairments

Gallery: Prosthetics with aesthetics

What can you do with your legs that I can’t do with mine?

Like the sprinter Oscar Pistorius, I was born without fibula bones, and my legs were amputated below the knee. I now have 12 pairs of prosthetic legs. My Cheetah legs are very functional, and I use them only for sprinting, biking or swimming. Right now I’m in my ā€œRobocopā€ legs, which have a shock absorber and a spring. Then I have four pairs of cosmetic legs made of silicone. These are incredibly human-looking, with veins, hair follicles and tendons. They’re made for different heel heights. If I come home from a month in Italy or Paris I have a suitcase just full of legs because I need options for different clothing.

What made you realise that you wanted more than just a standard medical prosthetic?

As a teenager I went to Madame Tussauds wax museum in London and saw a model of Jerry Hall. Everything was exactly replicated – the skin tone, the eye colour – and it looked amazing. At that point I was wearing legs designed to be worn with orthopaedic shoes – I mean what 17-year-old is going to wear an orthopaedic shoe? I realised I was talking to the wrong people about prosthetics. I needed to find the guys in Hollywood who were building the Terminator, or the guys from the wax museums – people who don’t come with the traditional view of doctors and prosthetists of how a prosthetic should look.

Do you feel more comfortable wearing legs that are human-looking?

I don’t have any issue wearing legs that aren’t human-like, but I want the option to have human-looking legs. This is part of a shift in the way disability is viewed, the idea that individuality and personal choice are important. How many colours do iPods come in? Apple doesn’t presuppose everyone wants a white one, and any prosthetic is like that, just like glasses. Now they’re called eyewear because they’re a fashion item, but not long ago they were seen as a medical device.

Has anyone ever referred to you as a cyborg?

For me that term means not human. I don’t like it. In the 15 years I’ve had a public persona, people have called me all kinds of things – trans-human, post-human, a cyborg. Is someone who wears contact lenses a cyborg? If we think of a cellphone or a pair of scissors as a prosthetic because they are augmenting our limbs, are we cyborgs when we use them?

Is technology bringing us closer to the point where disability can become super-ability?

Absolutely. We are already there with laser eye surgery. We don’t even consider people who are visually impaired disabled any more. There isn’t the stigma around wearing glasses that there was in the 1940s and 1950s. The technology gives us super-ability.

The golfer Arnold Palmer couldn’t have continued to play without his replacement titanium hip and Tiger Woods has had laser eye surgery twice. This gave him 20/15 vision – even better than ā€œperfectā€ 20/20 and a clear advantage for someone who plays a target sport. People are living much longer now and looking to technology to help push their bodies beyond their natural limit. That could be technology to aid and even augment ability that might have once been compromised with amputation or visual impairment, hearing impairment or ageing.

How far can you push the concept? Should people be able to augment themselves in any way they want?

They already are. If someone wants to get 50 piercings or modify their bodies by putting carbon horns under their skin then they can. Do we call them into the ethical debate about that? Then there’s plastic surgery. It’s not just semantics that we say breast ā€œaugmentationā€. Having a prosthetic in any other part of the body would be assumed to be connected with disability, but here we call it augmentation because we have decided that it is pleasing.

There’s a super-strength hearing aid on the market in the US. The adverts say you can sit on your front porch and hear people across the street talking. People who buy this will not be those who need hearing aids but those that want to eavesdrop. That’s augmented hearing sold under the guise of a hearing aid because eavesdropping is illegal. How far could you push this concept? I think it’s limitless.

What problems did you come up against as a professional athlete and bilateral amputee?

The first time I competed against other amputees I won everything, but the authorities said: ā€œThis isn’t fair. Technically, with two prosthetics she could be as tall as she wants to lengthen her stride.ā€ So I made myself shorter than I would be naturally but I got even faster because my centre of gravity was lower. They quickly shut up.

It’s rare to be a bilateral amputee. If you’re missing one limb, the idea is that you build another to achieve symmetry. A bilateral amputee can’t do that, so why look to human legs for inspiration for the prosthetic? Why not look at the fastest thing that runs? A Cheetah leg doesn’t touch the energy output of a real leg but it’s the best prosthetic available.

So how come you still broke world records?

It’s not just the legs, it’s me too! You’re forgetting that there’s a human being on top of these things. I began running at school and had to be fast enough to compete against able-bodied children, so my fast-twitch muscles developed early on. What infuriated me about last year’s ban on Cheetah legs (since overturned) was the assumption that your performance is just down to the legs. I was a very good athlete but Oscar Pistorius is on another level – he’s so gifted. The fact people want to negate that doesn’t make sense to me.

So what’s the solution?

If we’re going to have a conversation about augmentation in sport we need to look at all sports. No one has questioned Tiger Woods’s eye surgery. Do you hear anyone question people playing sport with a titanium hip or those new ultra-streamlining swimsuits?

Where is the line between drug-induced enhancement and robotic enhancement?

It is essential to understand that someone who runs with prosthetics is not analogous to someone who dopes with steroids. Even the implication that we are cheating by wearing a prosthetic is dangerous. The Cheetah legs are in no way an enhancement. They don’t even touch what human legs can do.

ā€œIt’s not enhancement – Cheetah legs don’t touch what human legs can doā€

Is disability an individual’s mindset or a reflection of the society they live in?

It’s always society that disables the human. I don’t mean that just in the sense of people without limbs; you can bring it back to gender and race politics. What’s happening now with people with physical impairments is similar to what was happening with race 50 or 60 years ago in the US. The status quo is being challenged, people know something is shifting but they’re not sure quite what to do with it.

Gallery: Prosthetics with aesthetics

Profile

Aimee Mullins was born without fibulae and a prognosis that she would never walk, but after a double amputation she learned to walk using prosthetic legs by the age of 2. At 17 she won a scholarship to Georgetown University, Washington DC, where she made the most of her love of sport and went on to break two world records at the 1996 Paralympic games in Atlanta, Georgia. Now an actress and model, her latest film is Into the Woods