Editorial: 鈥�Durban climate summit must accept degrees of responsibility鈥�
AS THE began in Durban, South Africa, on Monday, expectations could scarcely have been lower. A globally binding deal is further away than ever. That makes considerable warming from climate change inevitable.
In the last few weeks major reports by the International Energy Agency and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) have concluded that we can still meet the UN鈥檚 target of limiting warming to 2聽掳C above preindustrial levels. But climate scientists are far less optimistic. Many say the chance to avoid a 2聽掳C rise has been and gone, and we must now prepare for the damage to come.
Advertisement
To have a fair chance of keeping below 2聽掳C, global emissions would have to peak by 2020 or so before falling. There鈥檚 no sign of that: they made their biggest-ever leap in 2010. Many countries promised to cut their emissions at the 2009 UN climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, but modelling carried out by climate consultancy Ecofys, based in the Netherlands, shows that even if those cuts were implemented in full we would still see 3.5聽掳C of warming by 2100.
Read more: 鈥�Earth in balmy 2080鈥�
To meet the 2聽掳C target, even bigger cuts are needed. According to UNEP, nations must emit the equivalent of no more than 44 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide each year by 2020, but current pledges are 6 to 12 gigatonnes short. A UNEP report published last week says by combining faster uptake of renewable energy, improved energy efficiency, and cuts to other greenhouse gases.
A points out that it is much easier to cut short-lived greenhouse gases like methane, and fine atmospheric particles like soot from inefficient stoves. Cutting these emissions could keep the thermostat from rising by 2聽掳C until the middle of the century, buying us time to deal with CO2.
It is the inertia in our society that is the problem, says the in its report. The lifespan of existing power plants and factories commits us to 80 per cent of the total emissions that will take us to 2聽掳C. Construction over the next five years commits us to the rest, so unless we switch our investments from fossil fuels to low-carbon technologies within five years, 2聽掳C of warming is inevitable.
鈥淯nless we go from fossil fuels to low-carbon tech within five years, 2 掳C of warming is inevitable鈥�
The reality is that the 2聽掳C target is technically and economically feasible, but politically impossible. says that countries would have to go to a war footing to do it. He compares the situation to the second world war, when nations like the UK transformed their economies to deal with an overwhelming threat. This single-minded commitment can work miracles, but no country has any such plans.
The UK鈥檚 secretary of state for energy and climate change, , says the deadline for an international deal is 2015. Other countries, like the US and India, , leaving scant time to the desired emissions peak in 2020. And as Durban talks got under way this week, Canada announced it would not be participating in any successor to the Kyoto protocol.
What should we do if we cannot hit emissions targets? First, do not give up on cutting emissions, says . We don鈥檛 fully understand the climate, so we might emit more than is currently deemed 鈥渟afe鈥� and stay under 2聽掳C by sheer luck.
And don鈥檛 change the 2聽掳C target. It鈥檚 too early, says Corrine Le Qu茅r茅, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in the UK. The next IPCC report, due in 2013, could show that society can cope with a warmer world (see 鈥淲elcome to a world warmed by 2聽掳C鈥�). If it does, a small increment in the target might be justifiable, she says, but until then shifting goalposts would be premature and send the wrong message. 鈥淚 haven鈥檛 seen anything to suggest that 2聽掳C is less dangerous now than it was when it was adopted,鈥� Le Qu茅r茅 says. At all costs, Hoskins adds, we must avoid 4聽掳C. Indeed, this could wipe out the Amazon rainforest and halt the Asian monsoon.
Finally, some form of geoengineering may be necessary. 鈥淲e are going to have to look at CO2 removal,鈥� says , UK. Trees are already being planted to act as carbon sinks, and prototype technologies exist for sucking CO2 from the atmosphere. Hoskins says they could be essential later in the century to keep temperatures down.
