Āé¶¹“«Ć½

Feedback: Ghost in the latrine

The internet of things, strange road crossings, vegetarian razor blades, and more
Feedback: Ghost in the latrine
(Image: Paul McDevitt)

Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more

Ghost in the latrine

IS THE ā€œInternet of Thingsā€ – the computerisation of our homes heralded by futurists – really such a good idea? What happens when essential household appliances are online and vulnerable to hackers? Imagine the consequences if someone could hack into your toilet.

This is not merely a theoretical vulnerability. The Japanese company Lixil has developed a called Satis that aims to be comfortable, stylish and water-saving, with features that include a lid that raises and lowers automatically without being touched, and a self-cleaning spray. Two versions are available in the US for just $4200 and $5800.

Unfortunately, a security firm called Trustwave Holdings has found a bug in the toilet’s computerised control system. It is set up to allow control using an app, via Bluetooth – widely used for hands-free operation of phones – hard-wired with an access code of 0000. Trustwave says it told the manufacturer about the flaw, but never received a response, so it has now . If you happen to find yourself sitting on a toilet that flips its lid and sprays its bowl by itself, it’s not a poltergeist, it’s a prankster with an app.

Simon Horton wonders whether the missing hyphen in a London Underground sign offering ā€œReal time travel updatesā€ should be between ā€œrealā€ and ā€œtimeā€ or between ā€œtimeā€ and ā€œtravelā€

Pedestrians look right

A COLLEAGUE shows us his photo of an instruction for pedestrians painted on the road at a crossing on the Holloway Road in north London. It says: ā€œLook rightā€. Beside it is a large arrow, pointing left.

We’re reminded of the , used in psychology and neurology. This usually involves the names of colours, with each word printed either in the named colour or a different one. The task is to name the colour of the ink, not read the word. Incongruous pairs are harder to process and thus produce higher error rates, demonstrating interesting things about the mind of the person doing the test. Maybe Transport for London, which administers London’s roads, is doing a mass Stroop test on the citizens of Holloway. Do they obey the writing or the arrow? Their lives may depend on their choice.

A cup of tea and a lie down

READER Don Roworth was as puzzled as we were by a practice examination paper from CGP Books that asked for ways in which an experimenter could increase the rate of evaporation of water in a beaker, and offered as an answer ā€œdecrease the density of the waterā€ (3 August). John Owen-Jones was just one of many readers who pointed out that ā€œI usually reduce the density of water (and increase evaporation) by turning the ā€˜on’ switch on my kettle.ā€

Yes, John, this would have that effect – but decreasing the density is not responsible for increasing the rate of evaporation. It is the heating that does both.

Had this been a philosophy of science exam, it might have formed part of a discussion of causality but, as it stands, ā€œby really wanting a nice hot cup of teaā€ would be an equally good answer – wouldn’t it?

You can’t be serious!

HERE is a puzzle concerning electromagnetic fields. James Smith directs us to with the comment ā€œPick any sentence from this web page for a good chuckleā€. By way of example, he offers: ā€œCrystal Catalyst Technology has a unique composition and structure which allows it to absorb and then rebroadcast harmful electromagnetic radiations in a cleaner form.ā€

There is much more to chuckle at in the site’s enumeration of its ā€œhandcrafted emf protection devicesā€, but James adds that he especially likes the testimonials from satisfied customers that are dotted around the site. Now here’s the puzzle: assuming that they are not entirely made up, we cannot work out for sure if these comments express genuine enthusiasm or if at least some are written with tongue in cheek.

James, again, offers an example: ā€œThank you for your product. I devised a test using my Kiniseology [sic] skills which work with food allergies and YES your product makes a difference! One is stronger with the product when touching the TV, mobile or computer!! Well done, guys! I have long thought of how we could counter this excess of EMFs.ā€

Surely that’s tongue in cheek? We certainly hope so.

The universe is not enough

THE Yahoo Movies website recently from the new space movie Gravity. The text beneath it read: ā€œThe clip shows Sandra Bullock’s astronaut thrown into space after an explosion on a space shuttle. Watch it above, unless you’re claustrophobic.ā€ Matt Ashmore, who noticed this, comments: ā€œYour claustrophobia must be pretty insurmountable if you can’t stand to be in a space as small as, well, space.ā€

A mouthful of marketing

FINALLY, vegetarian Tony Green was relieved to be informed that the triple-blade razor he bought at Superdrug in Ipswich, UK, was ā€œSuitable for vegetarians and vegansā€.

Tony says: ā€œAll I have to do now is work out which part is supposed to be edible.ā€

Topics: electromagnetism

More from Āé¶¹“«Ć½

Explore the latest news, articles and features