
Feedback is our weekly column of bizarre stories, implausible advertising claims, confusing instructions and more
A song for a satellite gone
PLUCKY little Philaeās epic and lonely struggle against the absence of gravity ensures that at least some of us are gripped by its stalled quest (6 December 2014). Will it wake? The most hopeful estimates are that now is the time to listen (see āAsteroid ahoy!ā).
Feedback will not join what one journalist colleague called āthe idle speculationā. Instead we turn, not for the first time, to the words of John Lennon: āPlease, donāt spoil my day, Iām miles away / And after all Iām only sleeping.ā Now we know why these lyrics on the album Revolver.
Advertisement
Peter Gunn sends an ad, hinting at a revolution in biology, for āā. āGreen technology cosmetic science containing ancient mysteriesā, it goes onā¦
New dimensions in burglary
CLOSER to Earth ā indeed, several metres beneath it ā we have the raid on the Hatton Garden Safe Deposit Company in London, which netted a quantity of valuables that is undisclosed, not least to the tax authorities. The BBC captioned a photo thus: āThe image shows the hole made using a heavy-duty drill, a Hilti DD350. It measured 50cm (1.64ft) deep, 25cm (0.8ft) high, 45cm (1.5ft) wide and 89cm (2.9ft) tall.ā Within minutes four readers had written in. Arthur Chanceās representative query was: āThe only question is, if they can make 4D holes, how come they didnāt just step round the wall?ā We refer readers to any good book on multidimensional topology for explanation.
The BBC naturally retro-proofread its caption smartish. Paul Cooper, however, found that had the rather more interesting version.
More numerology of cosmology
MOVING away from Earth again, probably, we have further thoughts to report on the numerological or other significance of 187.5. This number seems mysteriously to recur in measures of the frequency dispersion of fast radio bursts (18 April).
Richard Chapman responds to Chris Conklinās observation that 1.875 is the smallest positive solution of the equation cos(x)cosh(x) = ā1 by suggesting investigation of a 10-dimensional analogue of this formula, which we shall not write out. āIt could shed some light on a possible metric amongst the 10 dimensions of string space,ā he proposes.
Fiona Vincent suggests that, contrary to our first assumption that 187.5 is a pure number, it has units: centimetres-3 parsecs, which she describes as āthe sort of convoluted unit that astronomers loveā. Had they chosen to express it instead in, say, inches-3 light-years, Fiona says, āthe common factor would have been 10,020ā. Weāre looking into that.
Falling for the metaphor peril
SEARCHING for references to 187.5 in our comprehensive piling system led it to throw up instead a thought about the challenge of presenting numerically based news. Consider the plight of Geraldine Bedell, founding editor of , a website for grandparents, asked to comment on a policy proposal floated in 2012 by George Osborne, then chancellor of the UKās exchequer. This boiled down to replacing the policy āif you are a pensioner, then you are entitled to a winter fuel allowanceā with⦠well, with an arithmetically complicated set of means-testing calculations to decide eligibility.
Geraldine : āWe know that whenever you have means testing you get a cliff edgeā, which is a reasonable summary of the arithmetic effect. āAnd very often the wrong people fall off the cliff,ā she went on. So which grannies would fall off?
A new source of randomness
INATTENTION has led us to discover an accidental random-text generator. We went to an online translation engine and started typing English into the āsourceā field on the left ā not noticing that it was expecting Arabic. Typing āThis is not Arabicā produced a string of Arabic text on the left and āThis Is Whoosh Net wearsā on the right-hand side.
This doesnāt seem to work in Hebrew ā although typing in āThis is not Hebrewā produces āThis is not Englishā, which suggests someone somewhere has been thinking about how it might work if it did. In Russian we start to get a direct transliteration of āThis is not Russianā, which is amended as we type, in the style of ādid you meanā¦ā suggestions, then translated as āThis IP chickpeas Rusinā. Probably, thereās a use for this⦠maybe.
Demo in doctrinal dispute
THE latest missive from oh-so-caring Christian Concern arrives: āDemo at hustings to protestanti-free speech Diane Abbottā. The Freudian typo blunts the groupās objection to the MPās objection to pickets outside abortion clinicsā¦
The naming of small things
FINALLY, another email caused us a double-take: its coming from the address info@rna.org made us expect something biomedical. Instead we read: āStudents: submit religion news stories for $600 award.ā
It seems is the site of the Religion Newswriters Association, and has been since 1997. Three-letter domains are quite the thing on the web these days: but the Religion Newswriters got to before, for example, .
They are not the only obscure virtual claim-staker. We note that is owned not by the famed research labs, but, since 7 August 1995, by Bell Laboratories Inc. of Madison, Wisconsin, which bills itself as āthe world leader in rodent control technologyā. The more famous labs registered on 10 January 1996. We wonder how many other organisations that should have known better wound up stuck with second-choice domain names.