Âé¶ą´«Ă˝

Imagine if we could play our sense of smell like a piano

If we can work out how chemicals interact with the many odour receptors in the nose, we’ll be able to digitise, archive and “play” smells, says Joel Mainland

Imagine if we could play our sense of smell like a piano

“Toying with our sense of smell is like playing a piano with 400 keys” (Image: Paola Nogueras/Monell Chemical Senses Center)

How do you go about predicting and manipulating smells?
Humans have about 400 types of working odour receptors in the nose but each person has a slightly different set, meaning that odours are often perceived differently by people. This makes prediction a hard challenge. And the truth is, science has been pretty bad at predicting what something will smell like just from its molecular structure. To do it, you need to understand how molecules interact with smell receptors. My team started by pinning down how single molecules interact, and then moved on to cocktails of molecules.

Can you give an example of individuals perceiving a smell in contrasting ways?
There’s a substance called androstenone, found in sweat and urine, and its receptor is called OR7D4. About 30 per cent of the population can’t smell it at all. As for the other 70 per cent, half smell it as urinous – really strong – and half smell it as sandalwood and kind of weak. So there are big differences in its perception: pleasant versus unpleasant, strong versus weak and then people who essentially can’t detect it at all.

So it’s a tough task you’ve set yourselves.
Certainly. But we have a computer model that can take receptor activation into account, and we explore the predictions it makes using our purpose-built olfactometer – a machine that mixes odours and presents the result to the nose.

What is your ultimate aim?
In the same way that primary colours can make any colour you want, we are in the process of identifying a palette of 40 “primary odours” that we hope can be combined in various ways to create the smell of anything that you might experience in daily life. If we can work out how to manipulate each of our 400 or so receptors, it means I can “play” your olfactory system to perceive any smell I want. It’s complicated because very few odours activate just one receptor and not another. And there are other drawbacks – it’s like playing a piano with 400 keys and you have to hit 100 simultaneously. Sometimes you just won’t have enough fingers.

Are you making progress?
It’s going to be pretty ugly for a while yet, but we are getting somewhere. As an example, we can take four molecules that don’t smell like strawberry, mix them together using the olfactometer and they smell like strawberry.

If we could reproduce everything in the human “smellscape” using primary odours, what are the likely applications?
When you know how to reproduce all odours, you can then digitise that information. So for starters you could archive odours, transmit them through the internet to be reproduced with suitable hardware, or add them to television and movies. Such technology could even eliminate supply chains that, for example, destroy sandalwood ecosystems. It’s hard to imagine the full potential.

Profile

is an olfactory neuroscientist at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. One focus of his work is to produce a model that can predict how something will smell by looking at its molecular structure

Topics: Biology / Senses

More from Âé¶ą´«Ă˝

Explore the latest news, articles and features