
In poorer countries, charging your phone can involve walking miles (Image: Yannis Behrakis/Reuters/Corbis)
CHANGE is in the air; what better time to consider humanityās end ā and its possible salvation?
Advertisement
Any artificial intelligence that makes better versions of itself will rapidly outcompete humans ā the so-called ātechnological singularityā. But will it āwantā to? Can AI āwantā anything? by Murray Shanahan runs through various scenarios, not all apocalyptic.
Back in the present, Jim Rogersās (St. Martinās Press, $26.99) points out that 1.2 billion people still donāt have electricity. But bringing power to the poorest should be easy: there is no old infrastructure in the way. And solving the energy problems of sub-Saharan Africa will provide a blueprint for weaning the developed world off oil. Rogers ran Duke Energy, the largest electric power company in the US, for 7 years; now the elite take note of him.
Big science and big engineering have adapted well to todayās asymmetric conflicts ā too well for Andrew Cockburnās taste. lays bare the political and moral consequences of leveraging technology to address the amorphous dreads of intelligence-starved diplomats. Pre-emption as a strategy comes under fire (as it were), as does the idea of fighting wars with remote cameras that are, according to one veteran, āno better than looking at Google Earth through a strawā.
The more virtual our lives become, the more we take craft seriously. Colin McGinnās (MIT Press, $24.95/Ā£17.95) provides the scientific argument for craft, linking various human tics, habits and anxieties to our ability to manipulate the physical world. Singularity enthusiasts take note: human intelligence (the only one we know much about) has had hundreds of thousands of years to become very odd indeed. Copying it will be hard.
This article appeared in print under the headline āPondering the fallā