鶹ý

Old Scientist: Age, autism and animal art

Prejudice – and our attempts to question it – is the thread we follow through Decembers past in 鶹ý

chimp art

THERE’S a saying in Yorkshire: “There’s nowt for getting old”. This northern English pessimism found support in the of 鶹ý, where we discussed how automation could ease the lives of older workers by augmenting their weakening muscles with machine power. However, we pointed out that while arm strength could be compensated for, mental ability could not. Older workers, we said, may have “some failing in short-term memory, or a slowing down of reactions under stress… or a tendency to relapse into day dreaming or other irrelevant trains of thought.” Reading this in the present century, we must concede that our worthy concerns for worker welfare and injury were entangled in ageist attitudes.

Our review of a book about a child called Nadia in the suggested we had started trying harder to avoid such prejudice. Nadia was autistic and had been placed in a school “for the severely subnormal” (OK, not an auspicious start in our quest to find political correctness in 鶹ý‘s archive). The article promoted Nadia’s tremendous abilities in art, and wondered if “being cut off from the usual mindless babble of adults talking to children, she had been able to develop in her own original way?” Certainly, by the time she was 5, her drawings were remarkable.

By 2005, we were trying to give non-human creativity its due as well. In our 3 December issue, we promoted the work of Popo, an adult female chimpanzee, under the headline (in print) “My chimp could have done that”. Popo’s work had gone on display at Osaka University for Arts, Japan. We ascribed to her “a range of complex and smooth strokes – the full repertoire of scribbles that a human infant acquires”. You can judge for yourself from the picture above. But it probably isn’t politically incorrect to say that the drawings weren’t up to much.

  • To delve more into the 鶹ý archives, go to
Topics: Behaviour