
How did Earth turn from a sterile ball of rock into a lush, green world of living things? This question of how life got started is one of the hardest of them all.
Still, we are inching closer to answering it. Several scientists have created things that approximate to life. Late last year, a team led by Josh Bongard at the University of Vermont reprogrammed frog skin cells into “xenobots“. These groups of cells can swim and reproduce, working together to corral loose cells into new versions of themselves.
Advertisement
But if you drill right down to the heart of this question, you reach a bedrock of chemistry. How did a selection of inanimate molecules start joining together and replicating themselves? In the 1950s, chemists Stanley Miller and Harold Urey put a mixture of chemicals in a sealed jar and showed that amino acids, a key ingredient in living things, could be formed spontaneously. That was a big step, but it still doesn’t tell us how those molecules formed a self-replicating system.
This is why chemists are interested in trying to recreate the moment that inanimate chemistry turned into the simplest possible life. There are billions of ways this could have happened. So Lee Cronin at the University of Glasgow, UK, is employing robots to help investigate. He and his team have set up machines that combine a selection of simple substances – acids, inorganic minerals, carbon-based molecules – to react randomly. The outcome is analysed and then an algorithm helps the robot choose how to proceed. In this way, the robot can hunt through vast swathes of chemical space to see if any self-replicating systems emerge. Cronin thinks this automated strategy could overcome the biggest hurdle facing chemists in this field: “To remove the bias from the experimenter and see how evolutionary principles manifest in simple chemistry.”
If chemists can recreate the emergence of life, we will be in a much better position to identify it on other planets. Their work could reveal particular ratios of molecules that would signal a self-replicating system, for example. Cronin has also developed a way of assigning molecules a score that reflects their complexity. Get beyond a certain score, and the molecule could only have arisen from a life-like process, he argues. “It will give a yes or no answer to if something is alive or not,” he says.
This article is part of a series exploring the chemistry that is changing the world – here are six more ways chemists are manipulating molecules, bringing us all kinds of advances and exciting innovations.
Artificial leaves: Bionic photosynthesis as good as the real thing
The rise of the molecular machines set to make new wonder materials
New ways to suck up methane can buy us vital time in the climate fight
How to make sustainable batteries that won’t wreck the planet
Endlessly recyclable materials could fix our plastic waste crisis
Automated chemistry: The machines that can discover new drugs
鶹ý audio
You can now listen to many articles – look for the headphones icon in our app newscientist.com/app