
Feedback is Āé¶¹“«Ć½ās popular sideways look at the latest science and technology news. You can submit items you believe may amuse readers to Feedback by emailing feedback@newscientist.com
More male than male
In common, we suspect, with most readers, Feedback is casting around for explanations of how the world got into its current position. So we were intrigued by journalist Michael Hobbesās , highlighting a 2013 paper in the American Journal of Sociology called
Advertisement
The hypothesis is that, when menās maleness is threatened, they overcompensate with āextreme demonstrations of masculinityā. For example, when men were told they were feminine, they responded by expressing more support for ādominance hierarchiesā, and said they wanted more personal power. They also became more supportive of war and homophobia.
But the bit that got Hobbesās attention, because itās so utterly ridiculous, is that they expressed interest in buying a sports utility vehicle (SUV).
Reading all this, Feedback was to be found staring into space while the faces of prominent people flashed past. We remembered when singer James Blunt was interviewed on Jessie Wareās podcast Table Manners. He admitted that during college days he went on a ā only to be diagnosed with scurvy.
We remembered the many instances of right-wing US men confessing on social media that they did not believe in the existence of the female orgasm because they had never seen a woman experience one.
We remembered Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg trash-talking each other over a proposed cage fight for a year. And we thought those sociologists might have a point.
Ready and not ready
While we are all still trying to adapt to the rise of artificial intelligence, the next technology revolution is on its way: quantum computers. Regular readers will know this already, thanks to issue 3530. But what about all the poor souls that didnāt pick that up?
Fortunately, computing giant and Netscape-killer Microsoft has the solution: a .
What is on offer? Why, teaching that will help leaders create āa clear and comprehensive quantum-ready strategy for durable, competitive differentiationā. Quantum computing, we are promised, āwill soon solve meaningful problems and unlock business value in various areasā. Steady with the hype, Microsoft.
As a result of all this coming quantum computing power, leaders must āunderstand the organizational change required to lead in the quantum era through a structured approach to business transformation aligned with your organization objectivesā. They should āassess quantumās impactā on their companies, and āexecute a quantum application roadmapā. In other words: do some research, make a plan and carry it out. Truly, you canāt put a monetary value on advice that combines quality and originality to that extent.
Of course, the problem is that we donāt know if/when quantum computers will become useful, or exactly what they will be useful for. So a company might spend a lot of time preparing for the quantum future, only to find that a startlingly different quantum future actually occurs.
In a very real sense, even if a company is quantum-ready, it isnāt quantum-ready. If only there was a thought experiment that could illustrate such a situation.
How to leave the planet
Given the aforementioned state of things, Feedback occasionally wonders if we might depart planet Earth for pastures new. Admittedly, space travel is fraught with perils like meteorite strikes, intense radiation and the sheer mind-boggling scale of interstellar distances that make your death inevitable long before your craft reaches another star system.
But on the other hand, maybe the grass is greener. In idle moments, we fantasise that the approaching asteroid 2024 YR4 is a disguised flying saucer, and we might be able to cadge a lift to Alpha Centauri.
So you can imagine our surprise when we learned, via sustainability consultant Niki Rust on job posting on . A company called Black Book Resourcing Ltd was seeking a Responsibilities include: āestablish and maintain life-support systemsā, āgenerate power and manage resources for long-term survivalā and (just a little bit of understatement here) āwork as a team under extreme conditionsā.
The rather long āessential requirementsā list includes āpeak physical and mental enduranceā and a ābackground in engineering, medicine, botany, geology, or survival skillsā. Confusingly, the list demands both āadaptability and resilience in complete isolationā and āstrong teamwork and leadership skillsā. Finally, you must have āno dependency on Earthās luxuriesāonly grit and determinationā. āPrior experience in extreme environmentsā is optional.
Donāt all rush: the listing has expired, and we are not at all sure it was genuine. Besides, given the frankly strenuous requirements, Feedback was stunned to see the proposed salary was just Ā£60,000-Ā£100,000 per year. However, the company deserves credit for listing the job as āpermanentā ā it most certainly would be. Bonus points for the location, which was described simply as āremoteā.
Got a story for Feedback?
You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This weekās and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.