Masud Husain
The 麻豆传媒 Book Club stepped away from science fiction for our October read, turning to the winner of the Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Prize instead, serendipitously announced just in time for us to start on our next literary adventure.
Six books had been up for the award, from Daniel Levitin鈥檚 Music as Medicine to Sadiah Qureshi鈥檚 Vanished: An unnatural history of extinction. Judges picked Masud Husain鈥檚 Our Brains, Our Selves: What a neurologist鈥檚 patients taught him about the brain and they praised it effusively, calling it 鈥渁 beautiful exploration of how problems in the brain can cause people to lose their sense of self鈥, and citing how these medical histories are 鈥渟kilfully interwoven with Husain’s personal story of moving to the UK as an immigrant in the 1960s, where he found himself grappling with his own sense of belonging鈥.
Advertisement
The first thing to say is: our book club members are much tougher judges than those on the panel for the Royal Society prize! While I think we were excited to get to grips with this book, and to venture into the world of non-fiction for a change, there were many issues that were raised and picked over by our readers.
Let鈥檚 tackle the positives first. For me, the book really got me thinking towards the end, when Husain tackled the idea of the self, how it has changed over the centuries and how the brain conditions discussed in the preceding chapters affected the sense of self of each of Husain鈥檚 patients.
Katherine Sarah agreed on this aspect. 鈥淣ot only is it an interesting insight into the brain and how it works, it also explores what determines 鈥榮elf鈥 and important skills that make us accepted by society,鈥 she writes in our group. Katherine has an interesting perspective on this, as someone who moved to live in another country where she couldn鈥檛 speak the language, which she found isolating.
鈥淚t really resonated with me how much language represents a part of yourself and how hard it is to portray yourself without it,鈥 she writes. 鈥淚nterestingly it also links to motivation which was inhibited in another patient the author described. When I couldn鈥檛 communicate in the language of my new country I also became extremely shy and it was hard to motivate myself to do simple tasks. It鈥檚 really interesting to read in this book about patients where only one specific aspect of their brain/personality is inhibited because in reality everything is interconnected.鈥
Gosia Furmanik also enjoyed this part of the book. 鈥淔or the most part, I did enjoy it – I think it was written in an engaging way, easy to read and the cases were interesting. I also appreciated the musings on identity and migration at the end of the book, maybe this was relatable to me because I migrated twice in my life,鈥 she writes.
Judith Lazell was a fan: 鈥淭his is very interesting and very readable. Great choice,鈥 she says. And Jennifer Marano enjoyed the chapter about Wahid, the bus driver who develops dementia with Lewy bodies and starts hallucinating. 鈥淭he thing it has changed most is my understanding of vision, including hallucinations,鈥 she writes. 鈥淭he world has always seemed so solid and real, but what I see is what my brain makes of the stimuli that enter my eyes. Makes me wonder what other people “see”.鈥
When I spoke to Husain, one of the things I wanted to ask him about was how he slotted everything together, because I did find it a little contrived at points, how he鈥檇 be, say, strolling through Soho pondering a recent patient and then notice a memorial plaque to Samuel Johnson. 鈥淭he irony made me smile,鈥 he writes. 鈥淭hat afternoon I had seen a man who was having difficulty remembering words and here was the haunt of the great lexicographer, Samuel Johnson, the man who had produced the first English dictionary of any note.鈥 Cue a raft of paragraphs about lexicography.
Husain explained in our chat how he fictionalised cases to protect patients, and he鈥檚 writing a narrative, so it makes sense that he needs to put a story together. But, as I said, for me it felt a little forced.
Niall Leighton also didn鈥檛 warm to this aspect of the book, but took particular issue with the patient discussions Husain writes about. 鈥淚 quickly became aware that much of the dialogue with Dr Husain’s patients appeared stilted, and I was left wondering how much of this, along with his descriptions of other events, might be fictionalised to some, even a large degree,鈥 he writes. 鈥淭his became increasingly irritating as the book progressed.鈥
Gosia agreed: 鈥淚’m glad I’m not the only one that noticed (and was irritated by) these things in the book! In the interview, the author did say that he fictionalised a lot of things about the patients to make them unrecognisable, so that might explain the dialogue, it was probably all invented.鈥
Others wrote about how you felt irritated by Husain鈥檚 ornate language. 鈥淪ometimes it seemed like the author would really prefer to be writing the 鈥榞reat British novel鈥 with florid descriptions that I found jarring in the context of a science book,鈥 writes Jennifer.
Judith and Niall also found it jarring how Husain included definitions of words in brackets, such as 鈥渧ertebrates (back-boned animals)鈥. 鈥淚 would have thought anyone reading this book would be cognisant of these,鈥 says Judith.
鈥淚 don’t know why he felt he needed to insult my intelligence by giving definitions of words like “atrophied”, “neuron”, and even “vertebrate” (more than once),鈥 says Niall. 鈥淭his may have been the action of an overzealous editor, but I was left wondering who he thinks his audience is.鈥
Personally, I think this is a tricky one: our book club members are a pretty informed bunch, and may well know the meanings of these terms, but it鈥檚 a tricky line to walk between being informative and being patronising.
The real issue for some members was Husain鈥檚 use of the word 鈥渘ormal鈥 when talking about brain conditions. For example, writing about tests he ran on David, who became lacking in motivation after having two small strokes, he writes: 鈥淲e got him to do the traffic light test again and this time he behaved differently. Like normal people, he started to take risks.鈥
鈥淪ome phrases, like鈥 referring to healthy people as “normal,” really irked me. What even is normal? Who gets to decide that?鈥 asks Gosia. 鈥淯nhealthy people are still normal, illness and disease are perfectly normal aspects of the human condition. For such a philosophically inclined book, this seemed glaring.鈥
Niall agreed. 鈥淚 quickly found myself extremely alienated鈥 I’m neurodivergent, and the use of the word “normal” will irritate, simply because the whole question of what constitutes “normal” is a vexed one,鈥 he writes.
Jennifer might have had quibbles with Our Brains, Our Selves, but she made it to the end and says she was glad to have done so. 鈥淎fter finishing, I watched part of the 麻豆传媒 interview with the author and it made me聽feel more tolerant of the aspects of the book that rubbed me the wrong way,鈥 she says. 鈥淚n the end I had to give him credit for being passionate about his work, writing a book, and getting it published, something I have not done and probably never will in my life.鈥
Never say never, Jennifer: perhaps one day we鈥檒l be reading your own book in the 麻豆传媒 Book Club! In the meantime, it鈥檚 on to our November read, another book that delves into the mysteries of the brain, but this time through the medium of science fiction. Come and find out more about Grace Chan鈥檚 Every Version of You, set in a devastated version of our world where a desperate humanity is uploading itself to a virtual utopia to escape their dying reality. But how will these virtual brains compare to the selves left behind?
Topics:





