The preprint database arXiv has been forced to limit paper submissions to stem a vast and quickening flood of AI-generated papers. Academics tell 麻豆传媒 that the massive influx of AI-generated papers is threatening to overwhelm the database and render it useless.
ArXiv offers a place for academics to host papers that haven鈥檛 yet been peer-reviewed or published in reputable journals. This gives colleagues a chance to keep up to date with what鈥檚 ahead in fields as diverse as physics, astronomy and economics.
But AI鈥檚 dramatic growth in mathematical prowess and its ability to automatically generate papers at speed with minimal human effort mean that the arXiv website is being flooded with an increasing number of papers.
Advertisement
In September 2024, 20,569 papers were submitted to arXiv. The following September, that number had grown to 26,646. But in a dramatic surge, were submitted in September 2026.
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology warns that the problem is serious. 鈥淩ight now, journals are flooded with submissions of AI articles,鈥� he says.
at Imperial College London聽says it has also become harder to submit genuine papers because arXiv moderators are overwhelmed, and papers can now disappear into the review queue for weeks at a time. The number of published papers is so large that Buzzard can鈥檛 manually read them every day. Ironically, he now has to use AI to tell him which papers to focus on.
鈥淎rXiv is a serious problem, and it might not survive the onslaught,鈥� says Buzzard. 鈥淛ournals are also under more and more pressure. The issue is that slop papers do not explain stuff well. It鈥檚 not just about correctness; it鈥檚 about human understanding, and AI is sometimes very poor at explaining.鈥�
With access to powerful AI tools, non-professional mathematicians are now able to solve reasonably difficult problems and automatically generate papers outlining the results that can then be posted to arXiv. But such papers are often criticised by mathematicians. For instance, at the University of Arkansas聽described one paper this week 鈥� which included a valid solution to a long-standing problem 鈥� as 鈥渂asically a piece of slop鈥�.聽
at the University of California, Los Angeles, recently complained to 麻豆传媒 that聽the way in which discoveries are being made and 鈥渄umped鈥� on the mathematical community may actually harm the field.
In response to the problem, arXiv spokesperson Kat Boboris wrote in a blog post that there are now . They are permitted to upload just two papers each calendar month, and can have three total active submissions at any given time.
ArXiv policy has long permitted authors to use AI, as long as it is disclosed. But Boboris wrote that arXiv has witnessed 鈥渁n increase in thin papers of narrow scope鈥� and 鈥渓ow value鈥� research that has forced it to find new measures to uphold quality.
ArXiv didn鈥檛 respond to a request for an interview, but the blog post states that, prior to the appearance of AI models that can generate papers, there was a practical limit to submissions, and that moderators would limit submitters who seemed to go beyond that.
Other projects are under way, aiming to adapt to the new reality of AI-enabled research. Among them is . While arXiv offers a place to host 鈥減reprints鈥� that aren鈥檛 yet peer-reviewed and published, Hexagon is a place for 鈥減re-preprints鈥� says Buzzard 鈥� somewhere to host AI-generated papers that mathematicians may not have fully understood yet.
