Sociologist Steven Yearley takes a long look at the way in which ideas such
as “think globally, act locally” spring from a mistaken assumption that we all
mean the same thing when we discuss the world or global problems. In Sociology,
Environmentalism, Globalization (Sage, £12.95, ISBN 0 8039 7517 1), he
asserts that in capturing the moral high ground by claiming the planet for
themselves, environmentalists are ignoring the fragmented nature of many of the
problems they want to resolve. And the emotional construct that hangs round the
notion that we are all global now, united in defence of planet Earth, obscures
the real forces acting to damage the environment. Even the role of science as
arbiter of quarrels about pollution, for example, is questioned.
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Physics
We need more radioactive drugs. Can we make them from nuclear waste?
Features

Technology
Table tennis-playing robot on track to becoming world champion
News

Health
Exercise advice for long covid may be doing more harm than good
Insight

Mathematics
Fermat's Last Theorem: still a must-read about a 350-year maths secret
Culture
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
Exercise advice for long covid may be doing more harm than good
2
Fermat's Last Theorem: still a must-read about a 350-year maths secret
3
Can we ‘vaccinate’ ourselves against stress?
4
The monstrous number sequences that break the rules of mathematics
5
We need more radioactive drugs. Can we make them from nuclear waste?
6
Table tennis-playing robot on track to becoming world champion
7
A whole new way to prevent death from sepsis shows promise
8
We might finally know how to use quantum computers to boost AI
9
Titan’s strange plains may be explained by unusual weather
10
If a bird flu pandemic starts, we may have an mRNA vaccine ready