A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
A quantum state that lasts forever may finally be within our grasp
2
Remarkable fossils rewrite the story of how animals conquered the land
3
Has the answer to life's origins been hiding in our cells all along?
4
Gas from Uranus reveals it has an icy centre
5
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
6
Cervical cancer deaths have plummeted thanks to HPV vaccine
7
Autism and ADHD are on the rise due to widening diagnostic criteria
8
Carl Sagan's The Demon-Haunted World is still supremely relevant today
9
Our brains have their first thoughts surprisingly early in life
10
Autism may have two distinct subtypes that vary by brain activity



