STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
Autism may have two distinct subtypes that vary by brain activity
2
A quantum state that lasts forever may finally be within our grasp
3
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
4
Sperm have been made magnetic to allow IVF inside the body
5
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
6
Walking shark found in Papua New Guinea is new to science
7
We may have finally solved cosmology's chicken-or-the-egg problem
8
What if the idea of the autism spectrum is completely wrong?
9
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
10
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion



