STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans
2
Are Neanderthals descendants of modern humans?
3
Hospital-acquired pneumonia reduced by daily toothbrushing
4
We might finally know how to use quantum computers to boost AI
5
Parrot uses his broken beak to become a dominant male
6
Particles seen emerging from empty space for first time
7
Exclusive report: Inside Chernobyl, 40 years after nuclear disaster
8
The biggest threat to Chernobyl is no longer radiation
9
Can we ‘vaccinate’ ourselves against stress?
10
Startling images show how fake news isn't just a 21st century issue



