FOR THIS year’s Feedback competition, readers were invited to invent a new scientific word that we need and define it in an appropriately pompous way. The competition attracted more entries than any previous one, and the standard was impressively high. The first shortlist of potential winners contained more than 50 entries, and whittling it down to just 10 was quite a challenge. We were interested, too, to note that in a competition about word definitions, readers embraced such a variety of definitions of the word “pompous” – including, in some cases, the short and the pithy. But who are we to argue? The word’s the thing…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
The biggest threat to Chernobyl is no longer radiation
2
Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans
3
Exclusive report: Inside Chernobyl, 40 years after nuclear disaster
4
Hospital-acquired pneumonia reduced by daily toothbrushing
5
Are Neanderthals descendants of modern humans?
6
We might finally know how to use quantum computers to boost AI
7
A whole new way to prevent death from sepsis shows promise
8
We urgently need to prepare for quantum computers breaking encryption
9
Electric vehicle owners could earn thousands by supporting power grid
10
The stunning physics of Project Hail Mary go back to ancient China



