Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Editorial: The real cost of US biodefence

2 March 2005

IN THE aftermath of the anthrax letter attacks in the US in 2001, the White House championed a massive effort to create and stockpile drugs and vaccines against potential biological weapons. At the time, many infectious disease researchers voiced concerns that work intended to improve our basic understanding of pathogens would be curtailed in favour of research into countering relatively rare infections that could, nevertheless, be turned into bioweapons.

By 2003, their fears had dissipated as it became clear that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) would be left in charge of dividing up research money. And…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, today with our introductory offers

or

Existing subscribers

Sign in to your account
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop