IT’S a shame when the demands of the media overshadow those of science. The closely managed razzmatazz that accompanied the debut of Ida – the fossil “that could change everything” about our ancestry – ensured that everyone was talking about her for a day or two. But it also meant that no one was allowed to see the relevant paper until after the event, so there was little chance to seek disinterested comment on the researchers’ claim (see “What you should know about chiropractic”). By the time doubts about Ida’s role in our past emerged, the circus had moved on.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Â鶹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Â鶹´«Ã½ articles
1
Are Neanderthals descendants of modern humans?
2
Largest ever map of universe captures 47 million galaxies and quasars
3
Exclusive report: Inside Chernobyl, 40 years after nuclear disaster
4
How autoimmune conditions can unexpectedly drive mental illness
5
Electric vehicle owners could earn thousands by supporting power grid
6
Collapse of key ocean current may release billions of tonnes of carbon
7
A key solution to climate change isn't happening – and that's good
8
People are refusing transfusions from donors vaccinated against covid
9
Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans
10
Adrian Tchaikovsky: 'I try and do interesting aliens'
