A GROWING number of supermarkets and restaurants proudly declare that the fish they sell is “sustainable” or “responsibly sourced”. This is a welcome sign that consumers are exercising their marketplace muscle to stop threatened species ending up on their plates. The trouble is that no consensus exists over what these labels mean – making it hard for consumers to distinguish genuine conservation efforts from dubious practices that hide behind ambiguous phraseology (see “Beware of ‘bluewash’: Which fish should you buy?”). The issue of declining fish stocks is too important to allow these initiatives to be undermined by specious or exaggerated…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
The relationship recession is even bigger for Gen Z than we thought
News

Technology
Killer robots are here – we must finally decide whether to accept them
Leader

Technology
Quantum computer quickly mines cryptocurrency while using less energy
News

Mind
How to sparkle in conversation with strangers
Comment
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
How to sparkle in conversation with strangers
3
Mysterious ‘cold blob’ in the Atlantic suggests the AMOC is weakening
4
First working nuclear clock heralds a new era in timekeeping
5
What is a ‘normal’ memory slowdown, and when should I worry?
6
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion
7
Alice Roberts: The forgotten origins of the human body
8
Think you have a good sense of humour? So do most people…
9
Flood of AI 'garbage' is pushing open-source developers to the limit
10
Global map reveals the vast scale of underground fungal networks