A GROWING number of supermarkets and restaurants proudly declare that the fish they sell is “sustainable” or “responsibly sourced”. This is a welcome sign that consumers are exercising their marketplace muscle to stop threatened species ending up on their plates. The trouble is that no consensus exists over what these labels mean – making it hard for consumers to distinguish genuine conservation efforts from dubious practices that hide behind ambiguous phraseology (see “Beware of ‘bluewash’: Which fish should you buy?”). The issue of declining fish stocks is too important to allow these initiatives to be undermined by specious or exaggerated…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from Âé¶¹´«Ã½
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending Âé¶¹´«Ã½ articles
1
Neanderthal infants were enormous compared with modern humans
2
The biggest threat to Chernobyl is no longer radiation
3
Exclusive report: Inside Chernobyl, 40 years after nuclear disaster
4
Monkeys walk around a virtual world using only their thoughts
5
Largest ever map of universe captures 47 million galaxies and quasars
6
How autoimmune conditions can unexpectedly drive mental illness
7
Collapse of key ocean current may release billions of tonnes of carbon
8
Beef is making a comeback – does it fit into a healthy diet?
9
People are refusing transfusions from donors vaccinated against covid
10
A key solution to climate change isn't happening – and that's good



