Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Life

Brain damage skews our moral compass

By Andy Coghlan

30 March 2010

Âé¶¹´«Ã½. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

It’s OK if she’s not dead

(Image: Brad Wenner/Flickr/Getty)

IS IT more morally acceptable to kill someone accidentally, or intend to kill them but fail? Most people would go for the first option – unless their brains are impaired in regions key to feeling emotion or divining the intentions of others.

This discovery is helping to unravel how we make moral judgements and has implications for people’s fitness to serve as jurors or judges.

To probe emotion’s role in moral decision-making, and her colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology turned to nine people whose emotional responses…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, today with our introductory offers

or

Existing subscribers

Sign in to your account
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop