Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
29 November 2003
From Patrick Le Corre, Electrolux Floorcare (UK)
I was interested to read your report on the recent UNECE research on industrial and domestic robots (1 November, p 23) , and gratified to see the Electrolux Trilobite included. However, your article suggests that Trilobite has not been a successful product for us. This is far from being the case: we consider the Trilobite …
29 November 2003
From Shawn Winnett, Australian Sports Drug Agency
I was interested and encouraged to read about the innovative scheme in the UK to routinely screen nutritional supplements for substances that might cause athletes taking them in good faith to fail dope tests (1 November, p 8) . Your readers might be interested to know that a similar scheme began operating earlier this year …
29 November 2003
From Nicky Gordon, British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
Your "Insider"report on neuroscience, and in particular the column entitled "In demand", suggests that excellence in neuroscience research is based almost entirely on animal research (1 November, p 53) . This is not the case, and if Nancy Rothwell of the British Neuroscience Association finds herself with a lack of young researchers with experience of …