Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
15 August 2007
From Orlando Hispano-Suiza
Richard Findlay's enthusiasm for fire (28 July, p 23) leads him to repeat the common error that it satisfies all seven criteria necessary to be considered alive. Alas, fire does not display irritability, neither here nor on Mars: if one pokes a flame with a stick it will neither run away nor turn around to …
15 August 2007
From Howard Dalton, (Defra)
I found your editorial on nanotech safety misleading (14 July, p 3) . Considerable effort is being expended in meeting regulatory and research needs. As you mention, the Royal Society's 2004 report looked at possible ethical, social or health and safety issues raised by nanotechnology that were not covered by existing regulations. The UK government …