Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
21 January 2026
From Joel Garreau, Broad Run, Virginia, US
I'm a fanboy of Annalee Newitz and hesitate to question anything they say about science fiction. But one aspect of their recent column has me scratching my head ( 27 December 2025, p 16 ). Can they really be mystified by why humans are far more interested in anything a member of their species does …
21 January 2026
From James Hardy, Belfast, UK
Richard Smyth says the growing trend of seeing our relationship with nature as a spiritual thing is a mistake. But "existential" or "mysterious" are surely better words to describe it than "spiritual". Bertrand Russell, the great atheist philosopher, famously said: "We know very little, and yet it is astonishing that we know so much, and …
21 January 2026
From Andrew Whiteley, Consett, County Durham, UK
Smyth is absolutely right that there are no lessons to be learned from nature. Morality and meaning cannot be obtained from nature or its study; their true source is elsewhere. It is hard not to feel that the deification of nature is a substitute for traditional religious belief. The fundamental question is: is nature – …
21 January 2026
From Eric Kvaalen, Les Essarts-le-Roi, France
Paul Whiteley points out that 75 per cent of the sunlight hitting solar panels is lost as heat, but roof-top solar water heaters convert 95 per cent into hot water. So let's combine the two! Have a layer of water between the solar panel and a glass plate, as in a solar water heater. The …
21 January 2026
From Ernest Ager, Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire, UK
Bryn Glover gives a negative assessment of the likelihood of life elsewhere in the universe. This is based on a Âé¶¹´«Ã½ article stating the odds of the formation of the last universal common ancestor from a soup of chemicals as "less than 1 in a billion" ( Letters, 3 January ). Of course, we …
21 January 2026
From Andrew Shead, Tulsa, Oklahoma, US
Decades ago, Âé¶¹´«Ã½ ran a feature about Rupert Sheldrake's hypothesis of morphic resonance, which posits that once something comes into being, recurrence becomes easier. He used crystallisation as an example: once accomplished, it becomes subsequently easier to do. We are in the universe; the universe is in us. All is one. As far as …
21 January 2026
From Bill Courtney, Altrincham, Cheshire, UK
After reading Alex Wilkins's article on the mystery of the missing meteorite, I asked Google's AI assistant whether you can make a pigment for painting rocks using iron meteorites, and whether iron objects look shinier in low morning or midday light. Its answer to both questions was yes. If accurate, this may indicate that Gaston …
21 January 2026
From Jon Hinwood, Melbourne, Australia
Regretfully, I must strongly assert that there is no giant "iron of God" meteorite. If ever there had been, there would be widespread legends about it, artefacts made from it and religious rituals or taboos involving it. If we accept that Ripert was an honest observer and truly saw something, consider that desert mirages are …
21 January 2026
From Susan Stocklmayer, Perth, Western Australia
In the article "Rapa Nui statues may have been built by small groups", the important materials utilised for the construction of these numerous and impressive stone statues are referred to only as having originated from "one quarry supplying the rock" ( 6 December 2025, p 17 ). Perhaps this is of no concern to most …