Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Letter: Nuclear longsight

Published 5 April 2006

From Warren Bullock

I am troubled by one thing in your article on permanent waste disposal: the timescale involved surely invalidates some of the audacious assumptions that underpin such projects (4 March, p 38). Climate change and the rise and fall of nations – for which there are arguably no effective countermeasures – are two factors guaranteed to occur during the 100,000-year period described.

The designers of these repositories should also plan for the sites to be “relocation-ready”, so that when conditions change, as they will, the cost of doing this is minimised.

In just a few hundred years our descendants will start looking at using their various space elevators as a cheap, efficient means of sending Earth’s most hazardous material on a one-way trip to the sun. A bit of forward thinking when designing repositories (multiple shafts, redundant access points, transportable containers) will put them in a better position to clean up our nuclear mess.

Singapore

Issue no. 2546 published 8 April 2006

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop