Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Letter: Two views on the naming of female body parts (1)

Published 2 July 2025

From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK

I agree with Adam Taor that some of the terminology used for female anatomy, especially reproductive parts, is extremely paternalistic, if not outright misogynistic, and could do with revision(14 June, p 21).

I remember a discussion on the subject involving Germaine Greer, who recalled that once she had found out “vagina” comes from the Latin for “scabbard”, she began to prefer the earthy, four-letter C-word, as it has a more interesting and less demeaning derivation from Old Norse or possibly Latin. Of course, given the less-than-positive uses to which the C-word is now put, making its anatomical use mainstream might be difficult.

Issue no. 3550 published 5 July 2025

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop