Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
1 April 2020
From Alistair Litt, Whangarei, New Zealand
Chris Walzer at the US Wildlife Conservation Society is right to be concerned that a ban on wildlife markets in China could drive the trade underground ( 7 March, p 23 ). As Adam Vaughan points out, this occurred when markets were suspended in the aftermath of SARS, and led to further spread of the …
1 April 2020
From Keith Tritton, Great Gransden, Cambridgeshire, UK
Leah Crane describes the use of three-filter colour combination in Hubble Space Telescope images ( 7 March, p 34 ). They weren't the first to yield astronomical colours using this technique. In particular, there were the superb images that David Malin produced from the 1970s onwards at what was then the Anglo-Australian Observatory. These were …
1 April 2020
From Robert Fizek, Newton, Massachusetts, US
Michael Bond reports research on what people do when lost in the wild ( 29 February, p 40 ). It strikes me that the way people behave in such situations describes much of the human condition. The untrained human imagination constantly projects our concerns into the future. Since we can't truly predict or control that …
8 April 2020
From Anna Butcher, Brookton, Western Australia
Thank you to all the staff at Âé¶¹´«Ã½ for giving us the facts about covid-19. You are amazing. We were travelling in Italy and the Netherlands in February and early March. Language was no barrier to making informed decisions, but the lack of facts was. We were surrounded by misleading anecdotes, biased and unscientific …
8 April 2020
From Brian Horton, West Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Your cover suggests that Steve Haake will tell us whether running or walking is best for your health ( 14 March, p 34 ). His answer seems to be that they are both good, though running can let you take more exercise in a given time. But for a 20-minute jog, say, this doesn't account …
8 April 2020
From Alexander Grant, Derby, UK
You ask about the relative merits of running and walking. I am 82 years old and consider myself to be reasonably fit. I haven't been to a gym since my schooldays and I don't go running. In my younger days, I cycled to work 12 kilometres each way five days a week and did a …
8 April 2020
From Peter Billard, Stuttgart, Germany
Besides running and walking, there is a comparatively new kid on the block, namely "Nordic walking". This is walking with poles, derived from Nordic skiing. Like walking and running, it can be practised at various levels. It can also allow people who are elderly or frail to remain active while protecting them from falls. The …
8 April 2020
From Richard Oliver, Attenborough, Nottinghamshire, UK
Christel Cederberg and Hayo van der Werf are no doubt right that broad comparisons of the environmental impact of conventional and organic agriculture are prone to be overly simplistic ( 21 March, p 25 ). Both systems operate under rules and regulations designed, in part, to mitigate environmental effects. Organic production adds an additional layer …
8 April 2020
From Hazel Russman, London, UK
Luce Gilmore states that the problem of free will vanishes once it is accepted to be illusory (Letters, 21 March ). Of course it does, and so does any other problem that is treated in the same way. Why don't we declare covid-19 to be illusory? Then we can all go back to normal life.