Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
24 April 2019
From Tony Spottiswoode, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK
Tom Stafford notes the ability of a cellular automaton to generate an endless, unpredictable set of behaviours, given the right rules and starting conditions – importantly, not the same starting conditions ( 6 April, p 34 ). I am not clear why this should give comfort to those who believe that free will isn't a …
24 April 2019
From Matt Black, Blockley, Gloucestershire, UK
Stafford's fascinating article on free will argues that if a simple model like a cellular automaton can generate complex, non-linear states, then animals can't be mere mechanistic machines. He suggests that we need choice to navigate and respond to the non-predictable conditions that our complex world generates. I agree. But this might seem to skirt …
24 April 2019
From Virginia Trimble, Irvine, California, US
Tony Green notes that according to his kettle, the cup he uses for coffee holds two cups, but his coffee maker thinks it is three (Letters, 2 March ). You report that the UK's National Health Service recommends servings of 80 grams. A standard US serving of fruit , vegetables, meat and fish is 4 …
24 April 2019
From Peter Leach, Nercwys, Flintshire, UK
Madeleine Finlay reports some clean-up solutions for space debris ( 30 March, p 26 ). Who will pay for this? Does the "polluter pays" principle apply in space? I suspect that any clean-up attempts will be funded by national governments, and therefore by you and me. But what about privately funded space missions? How can …
24 April 2019
From Roger Schafir, London, UK
Richard Webb gives the pragmatic version of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics: that it isn't about what is really happening at the unseen, microscopic level, but simply a prescription to calculate observational effects ( 23 March, p 28 ). But it is more profound than that. It doesn't say that you can't know the …
24 April 2019
From Bruce Mullinax, Great Falls, Virginia, US
You report the discovery of 5000 to 10,000 underwater mountains ( 23 March, p 8 ). Just think of all the submarines carrying nuclear weapons that were cruising the oceans using incorrect charts... The editor writes: • An issue in oceanography is the amount of research kept secret to conceal the capabilities of such submarines. …
1 May 2019
From Robert Cailliau, Prévessin-Moëns, France
My lack of free will gives me no choice but to disagree with Tom Stafford 6 April, p 34 . Cellular automata may look unpredictable to him, but surely they produce exactly the same pattern when started from the same initial conditions, unless a random number generator based on quantum physics is incorporated. What does …
1 May 2019
From Daniel Richardson, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire, UK
Stafford is optimistic that we do have free will to make choices. I wonder whether he freely chose to believe that. His genes, prior life experience and career researching the brain all shaped his own brain structure to hold that belief: so the true act of free will would be to somehow reject his own …