Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Letters archive

Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


30 October 2024

Do we make reality? Maybe, maybe not (1)

From Adrian Smith, Addingham, West Yorkshire, UK

I don't buy the idea that "we make reality". I believe subatomic entities exist independently of us and that these entities oscillate and interact with wave-like properties. However, the equations we use to describe these interactions are human-made, so it is at this point that we create our own reality. ( 12 October, p 40 …

30 October 2024

Do we make reality? Maybe, maybe not (2)

From Larry Stoter, The Narth, Monmouthshire, UK

The idea that there is no objective reality puts the "observer" centre stage. But what constitutes an observer? Much of quantum physics avoids this issue, implying that only humans qualify. Surely it is arrogant to think that only we can be observers? If the history of science teaches us anything, it is that making humanity …

30 October 2024

Do we make reality? Maybe, maybe not (3)

From Patrick Butterly, Buckfastleigh, Devon, UK

Oriti, a theoretical physicist, says that "we have to embrace the fact that we make reality". That might come as a shock to scientists, but not to poets and novelists: they have always thought it obvious that reality inheres not in the common phenomenal world, but in the perceptions of that world in individual minds.

30 October 2024

Do we make reality? Maybe, maybe not (4)

From Faith Anstey, Dalguise, Perth and Kinross, UK

If we make reality, are we part of reality or not? If we are, do we make ourselves – and all our thoughts, theories and so on? And if not, why not?

30 October 2024

My frenemies seem to be following me

From Maggie Cobbett, Ripon, North Yorkshire, UK

David Robson's piece on "frenemies" set up an intriguing question in my mind. Why is it that people I would really like to see again rarely cross my path, whereas those I would prefer to avoid appear everywhere I go? Some kind of negative attraction at play, perhaps? ( 19 October, p 40 )

30 October 2024

Here's to revelling in the mystery of the cosmos

From James Hardy, Belfast, UK

Leah Crane's article about seeing Saturn through a telescope as a child and being inspired to love space was fascinating. It called to mind philosopher Bertrand Russell, who, although an atheist, freely admitted to the immense mystery of the cosmos: "We know very little, and yet it is astonishing that we know so much, and …

30 October 2024

No shock that pyramids were an ancient favourite

From Robert Masta, Ann Arbor, Michigan, US

Many thanks for the Flint Dibble interview. It is no great surprise that multiple cultures would independently develop pyramids. We humans have a natural affinity for high places, probably dating back to spotting predators or enemies as well as a desire to be closer to the sky. ( 19 October, p 37 ) A pyramid …

30 October 2024

Water from air: the Incas got there first

From Alex McDowell, London, UK

The idea of extracting drinking water from the air, as deployed in a Florida children's hospital after recent hurricane disruption, isn't new. The Incas, living in mountainous regions too high to get rain, channelled dew into cisterns and may have used fog fences to collect moisture that was hanging in the atmosphere. ( 19 October, …

6 November 2024

Solar sails on the ISS is a great idea

From Sandy Henderson, Dunblane, Stirling, UK

I applaud Eric Kvaalen's idea of using solar arrays on the International Space Station as solar sails that might keep it in orbit. Few places would be better suited to testing designs for solar sails. As for the favoured plan to bring down the ISS, I deplore the mindset of those who would scrap a …

6 November 2024

This scheme is best for tackling wealthy emitters

From Mini Grey, Oxford, UK

The richest 1 per cent of the US population is responsible for more carbon emissions than the entire lowest-income 50 per cent. Your article on this advises more climate policies targeting those responsible for the largest emissions, with inheritance and wealth taxes. But there could be a fairer, clearer way to hit them straight in …

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop