Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Letters archive

Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


26 June 2024

And a vote in favour of Dyson spheres

From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK

Jim McHardy suggests that advanced civilisations won't need Dyson-style, whole-star, solar energy-collection structures because they will have minimised their energy consumption ( Letters, 8 June ). But as far as we know, creating or accelerating matter requires a non-negotiable amount of energy (given by E = mc 2 and E = ½ mv 2 , …

3 July 2024

No doubt about it, babies are conscious (1)

From Talia Morris, Cape Tribulation, Queensland, Australia

From 15 June, p 19 It is amazing that there are still doubts about whether human newborns are conscious and capable of experiencing pain. Newborn foals and calves are born with their eyes open and are capable of walking almost immediately after birth. I have been at the birth of several spectacled flying foxes, amazing …

3 July 2024

No doubt about it, babies are conscious (2)

From Louise Quigley, Braintree, Massachusetts, US

I can't believe that scientists are conducting experiments to find out what every parent has known since the dawn of humanity, the moment they look in their baby's eyes just seconds after it takes its first breath: there is someone there. An ignorant, inexperienced, inarticulate someone, to be sure, but a person ready to be …

3 July 2024

Time to get on with tests of this geoengineering

From Mike Graham, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK

From 8 June, p 15 So sulphur dioxide emissions from ships burning heavy marine fuel cooled Earth by brightening ocean clouds, but declines in such pollution since 2020 have resulted in warming. This unplanned experiment in geoengineering indicates that we should now fund tests of marine cloud brightening using ships to spray seawater into clouds …

3 July 2024

Species counts can fail to capture biodiversity

From David Barden, Llantrisant, Mid Glamorgan, UK

From 25 May, p 36 Having read your piece about how to measure biodiversity, it is worth remembering that although the species concept is immensely useful, it does have its limits. This is because species descriptions, in order to be practical, have to encompass a lot of variation between individuals, both in their outward characteristics …

3 July 2024

No surprise that microbes are eating plastic waste

From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK

From 22 June, p 16 I was heartened to read of another organism that has taken to consuming one of our throwaway polymers. To be fair, given the high energy density of plastics, it isn't surprising that microbes are evolving to feed on them. I agree with Annika Vaksmaa about the dangers of introducing this …

3 July 2024

Let's hope fiction doesn't become fact

From Barry Isaacs, Lamerton, Devon, UK

From 22 June, p 40 I see with some alarm that you describe the New Horizons spacecraft as "plucky" – a term usually defined as having courage in the face of adversity. This seems to imply that the probe has acquired intelligence, can understand what it is doing and experiences human emotions. This isn't far …

3 July 2024

There is simply no safe amount of alcohol

From Dan Roach, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, UK

From 15 June, p 28 I take issue with claims that scientists are fairly unanimous that drinking alcohol in moderation is healthy. While I agree that this is preferable to excessive drinking, there is no amount of alcohol consumption that doesn't affect health. In fact, the World Health Organization published a statement on this in …

3 July 2024

On the strange result of the double-slit experiment

From Eric Kvaalen, Les Essarts-le-Roi, France

From Letters, 22 June There is some misunderstanding about interference in the double-slit experiment. The electron doesn't interfere with the next electron, but with itself.

3 July 2024

Many good reasons not to tip rubbish into a volcano

From Alex McDowell, London, UK

From Letters, 22 June Robin Stonor asks why not throw rubbish in a volcano. On contact with hot lava, many materials would vaporise, causing explosions. Due to the lack of oxygen, plastics and organic materials would decompose, not burn – this would produce flammable and toxic gases, including greenhouse gases.

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with Âé¶¹´«Ã½ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop