
Space oddity
SHMUEL Bialy and Avi Loeb at Harvard University have come up with a novel explanation for the origin of āOumuamua, the interstellar object seen passing through our solar system in October 2017.
They calculate that it may not be shaped like a lumpy asteroid or comet, but instead be flat and wide. If it is a big sheet, it could behave like a light sail, which could account for apparent anomalies in its trajectory.
Advertisement
But the researchers arenāt just suggesting it has a strange shape. āāOumuamua may be a fully operational probe sent intentionally to Earth vicinity by an alien civilisation,ā they write in , posted on the arXiv preprint server.
Itās too late to take new pictures of āOumuamua, so there is no way to say for sure that the interstellar object wasnāt aliens. But we also canāt say for sure that it wasnāt a blue whale, a large piece of cheese⦠or an asteroid.
Space oddity
PERHAPS we could do more to make contact with life elsewhere in the galaxy. James Clark, a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, calculates that a 1 to 2-megawatt laser, focused through a massive telescope, would produce a beam of light that would stand out like a āplanetary porch lightā, visible from 20,000 light years away.
āāPlease be aware you canāt bring any real or replica bombs⦠on board.ā Train firm Eurostar issues a helpful reminder to those travelling for first world war commemorations in Franceā
Clark admits that the plan has some safety risks. The beam would damage the vision of anyone who looked at it, and might scramble cameras on spacecraft that pass through it. āIn general, this was a feasibility study,ā he said in a . āWhether or not this is a good idea, thatās a discussion for future work.ā
For more existentially pressing reasons, Feedback hopes the project goes no further. As sci-fi author Cixin Liu pointed out in a recent interview with Āé¶¹“«Ć½ (8 September, p 42), āwe simply donāt know whether we are talking to friends or enemiesā.
Unappetizing exhibit
SPICY rabbit heads, fruit bat soup and cheese riddled with insect larvae are among the exhibits on show at the Disgusting Food Museum, which opened on 31 October in Malmo, Sweden. The idea is to challenge visitorsā notions of disgust, and encourage them to be open-minded about foods from other cultures.
The most offensive of the lot, according to curator Samuel West, is an Icelandic fermented shark. āIt tastes like chewing on a urine-infested mattress,ā he told Reuters. The museum is well prepared in case any of the exhibits prove too much for some visitors: the entrance tickets are printed on vomit bags.
Pocket pebbles
IT WAS foolish of us to hope that the $145,000 fine levied on Gwyneth Paltrowās Goop brand for misleading claims about rose quartz and jade eggs (27 October) would curb the spread of crystal healing fruitloopery. On 4 November, the UKās Daily Mail newspaper chimed in with a guide to improving your health and furthering your career with the help of shiny minerals.
According to crystal healer and reiki master Tamara Driessen, ācitrine will cheer you on as you pluck up the courage to ask for a pay riseā, while āblack tourmaline will protect you from draining work politicsā.
This is reassuring for anyone concerned about the young children working in industrial mines in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where many of these stones are sourced. Presumably there are enough crystals in the mines to neutralise any tiresome political troubles.
Return to sender!
HOW many mosquitoes can you fit in an envelope? This isnāt a joke ā scientists need to know so they can post live, sterile mosquitoes around the world in an effort to eradicate the disease-carrying insects.
As readers might have discovered themselves, mosquitoes are remarkably resistant to being squashed. By packing them into a syringe, Hae-Na Chung at New Mexico State University and her colleagues found that 240 mosquitoes can survive being compressed into . That is equivalent to 1200 mosquitoes in a teaspoon. Or 6.6 billion in a phone box. Donāt have nightmares.
Dead certain

GENETIC tests are sometimes treated as infallible, but a report from Kazakhstan reminds us they are anything but. Aigali Supugaliev was reported missing on 9 July. Two months later, a DNA test determined that a decomposed corpse found near his home was 99.92 per cent likely to be the missing man, based on a comparison with his nail clippings.
Some time after his funeral, Supugaliev reappeared, alive and well. He had taken a job on a distant farm without telling his family. Upon seeing him, his niece āalmost collapsed with a heart attackā, his brother told .
The scientist that carried out the test insists the forensics institute he works for isnāt responsible for the familyās misunderstanding. āIt is impossible to state unequivocally that this is the body of a person, relying only on the results of the DNA examination,ā said Akmaral Zhubatyrova . āWe should not forget about the remaining 0.08 per cent.ā
You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This weekās and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.