Āé¶¹“«Ć½

Treasure trove of ancient human remains hints at undiscovered species

A haul of more than 100 ancient human bones found in a cave in South Africa may belong to a previously undiscovered human species
A wealth of human remains have been found in Cave UW 105
Lee Berger

A treasure trove of ancient human remains discovered in a cave in South Africa could give us a new picture of human evolution – and evidence of a previously undiscovered species.

Lee Berger at the University ofĀ the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and his colleagues call the cave simply UW 105 because it is the 105th site they have identified. It is a short walk from the Rising Star cave, where his team discovered a new species called Homo naledi in 2013. The following year, the group found a fragment of a lower jaw with aĀ single tooth in UW 105. TheyĀ belonged to a hominin, but at the time the Rising Star excavation was a priority.

Then covid-19 happened and gave the team an opportunity toĀ gather remains from UW 105. Berger estimates that his team has found between 100 and 150 pieces of bone there in the past few months, including bits of skull, shoulder blades, teeth andĀ limb bones. He says there are at least four individuals, ofĀ which one seems to be an adult and two are juveniles.

They aren’t modern humans,Ā nor are they ±į.Ģż²Ō²¹±ō±š»å¾± or Australopithecus sediba, theĀ other species Berger’s groupĀ hasĀ discovered. The teeth are too big for that.

Berger says the teeth look similar to a molar found in the nearby Gondolin cave thought to belong to Paranthropus robustus, a big-bodied hominin that lived between 1 and 2Ā million years ago. Its big teethĀ may have been used for chewing tough plants like grass.

Large teeth have been thought of as ā€œprimitiveā€, soĀ thisĀ might suggest that theĀ owners of the big teeth inĀ UWĀ 105 belong to an early species, but Berger says estimating age based on shape is ā€œa fool’s errandā€. Evolution doesn’t go in straight lines, he says, so sometimes seemingly primitive traits can emerge in recent species. He points to ±į.Ģż²Ō²¹±ō±š»å¾±, which had a skull onlyĀ slightly larger than that ofĀ aĀ chimpanzee, yet which livedĀ justĀ 250,000 years ago.

Instead, Berger is waiting forĀ the results of independent dating analyses. The fossils allĀ originated in a layer of rock inĀ the cave that is covered byĀ flowstone: a layer formed whenĀ minerals were deposited by flowing water. It should beĀ possible to determine theĀ flowstone’s age, giving aĀ minimum age for the fossil-bearing rock.

It is too early to say whether the remains are of a new species of early human or a known one, but they seem unlike anything else known. Tracy Kivell at the University of Kent, UK, one of Berger’s regular collaborators, says that both the back and front teeth are large – unlike with P. robustus, which only hadĀ big back teeth. Also, the bones from the rest of the body are relatively small, suggesting aĀ slim build – which is unusual forĀ a big-toothed hominin.

ā€œTo me, that suggests a different way of adapting toĀ one’s environment,ā€ says Kivell. ā€œEven if they look fairly similar, things that adapt to their environment in different ways are probably different species. Based on the little information we have for now, IĀ would say it’s looking like it’s heading in that direction.ā€

Sign up to Our Human Story, a free monthly newsletter on the revolution in archaeology and human evolution

Topics: Ancient humans / Archaeology