Letters archive
Join the conversation in Âé¶¹´«Ã½'s Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
14 January 2026
From Richard Hind, Chapel Haddlesey, North Yorkshire, UK
Since 2002, I have been teaching in the further education sector and have seen the impact of new technologies. AI is the most disruptive so far ( 27 December, p 24 ). I started to think about how these models learn, in the context of some well-established theories of learning. While large language models (LLMs) …
14 January 2026
From Dyane Silvester, Arnside, Cumbria, UK
Your article "Lichens unleashed" paints a picture of lichens as complex symbiotic communities with the ability to survive in space and thus potentially undertake interplanetary travel ( 27 December, p 38 ). Has anyone considered they could, in fact, be intelligent and highly developed aliens – albeit on a microscopic scale – living peacefully on …
14 January 2026
From Dave Holtum, Bath, UK
Tim Rafferty's claim that simulators would only have to "simulate our ability to observe the universe" is often called lazy evaluation, but it faces a number of hurdles ( Letters, 3 January ). Objects cannot simply "pop" into existence: their current state requires a massive, recursive calculation of their entire history, effectively forcing a full-scale …
14 January 2026
From Mike Glennon, Hastings, East Sussex, UK
I enjoyed Tim Rafferty's letter about simulation time. However, many simulations run to an end to see a result and then decisions are made based on that result, so it would make sense to run the simulation as fast as possible. This raises the question: do those of us in the simulation experience time at …
14 January 2026
From Eric Cole, Dollar, Clackmannanshire, UK
If we are indeed living in a simulation run by a "superior" being, one thought consoles me: they will themselves be having doubts regarding their own existence.
14 January 2026
From Peter Slessenger, Reading, Berkshire, UK
Your article "Satellites to provide sunshine on demand" reminded me of a similar proposal reported by Âé¶¹´«Ã½ in 1998. You kindly printed my letter at that time pointing out that many species of animal use the moon to determine the time to moult or spawn, or use it as a navigation aid when migrating, …
14 January 2026
From Jon and Christopher Fanning, Wilberfoss, East Riding of Yorkshire, UK
I feel compelled to point out the error in David Longhurst's simplification of Schrödinger's cat. The box that the cat is sealed in contains a vial of poison gas that will be broken by the decay of the single radioactive atom in the box, whereupon the cat will be killed instantly. As there is only …
14 January 2026
From Mark Pickin, Easingwold, North Yorkshire, UK
The repeated reference to returning samples to Earth for study in your article "How to spot an alien" gives me a great sense of foreboding. As a virologist, I don't understand how any rational scientific mind could ever contemplate bringing material back to Earth if, never mind because, it shows some signature of alien life. …
14 January 2026
From Claire Berrell, Hervey Bay, Australia
Sam Wong's "A ticklish question" states that "it is impossible to tickle yourself". But I disagree – under one specific circumstance. When sleeping, if I don't keep my twitchy fingers away from my torso, I will wake myself up with that "being tickled by someone else" feeling. I wonder if anyone else experiences this?